Appendix C: Government Regulations Affecting Configuration Aerodynamics

A number of government regulations affect the aerodynamic design of airplanes. The goal is to ensure safe flight. The government is not interested in sacrificing safety for improved economics. For example, the second segment climb requirement described below often determines the engine thrust requirement for twin-engine transports. Other examples include reserve fuel requirements, emergency exits, and flight in icing conditions.

The specific safety-related regulations for commercial aircraft are made in the US by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and have been known as the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) from 1958 onwards. However, FAR is also an acronym for “Federal Acquisition Regulations,” and this has led to confusion at times. To avoid this confusion, the term “14 CFR” has been formally adopted for the Federal Aviation Regulations. The United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 14, contains rules and regulations issued by the US Department of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration for Aeronautics and Space, hence the term “14 CFR.” These regulations can be found online in the Code of Federal Regulations, or eCFR, at the following URL: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14. As an example, Part 25, Subchapter C, Chapter I contains Airworthiness Standards for Transport Category Airplanes: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-25. Examples of regulations include the takeoff and landing distances, engine-out performance, noise limits, icing performance, and emergency evacuation to name a few.

In Europe, the equivalent Joint Aviation Requirements (JARs) are managed by Joint Aviation Authorities and by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). Military aircraft also have numerous requirements. In both situations, the emphasis is on safety, including the handling qualities.

Note that many aerospace engineers continue to use the term FAR when referencing the 14 CFR regulations. You should be aware that this is the case with the material in this appendix that was initially prepared when FAR was a much more widely used and accepted term.

The interpretation of the requirements is often complicated. The summary given in this appendix is based on summaries given in appendix F in the aircraft design books by Raymer,[1] Torenbeek,[2] and Roskam.[3] Table C-1 summarizes the various FAR Parts that most directly influence configuration aerodynamics work. The specific requirements depend on the particular type of airplane.

Category Various Normal Transport
Airworthiness standards airplanes Part 23 Part 23 Part 25
Airworthiness standards engines Part 33 Part 33 Part 33
Airworthiness standards propellers Part 35 Part 35 Part 35
Noise (prop driven: App. F) Part 36 Part 36 Part 36
General operating & flight rules Part 91 Part 91 Part 91
Operations: Domestic, large a/c - - Part 121
Air travel clubs using large a/c - - Part 123
Air taxi & commuter operators - Part 121* -
Agricultural aircraft Part 137 - -

Table C-1: FAR parts directly applicable to design. (*Formerly Part 135; from Torenbeek, then Raymer, p. 803)

Characteristic Small Generally large
Various (normal, utility, acrobatic and agricultural; from Torenbeek, then Raymer, App. F; see FARs for details.)
Part 23
Normal
Part 23
Transport
Part 25
Max TOGW ≤ 12,500 lb ≤ 12,500 -
No. of engines one or more two or more two or more
Type of engine all types props only all types
Flight crew one or more two two or more
Cabin attendants none < 20 pass: none
≥ 20 pass: one
< 10 pass: none
≥ 10 pass: ≥ 1
Max no. of pass. 10 11-23 unlimited
Max altitude 25,000 ft 25,000 ft unlimited

Table C-2: Categorizing aircraft—FAA criteria synopsis

With the type of airplane defined above, the various requirements are summarized in the following tables.

Table C-3 defines takeoff requirements, and table C-4 defines the so-called “balanced field length” requirement. For early design studies, the balanced field length is usually determined without allowing for a stop way past the end of runway.

Item MIL-C5011A FAR Part 23 FAR Part 25
Velocity VTO ≥ 1.1 Vs
VCL ≥ 1.2 Vs
VTO ≥ 1.1 Vs
VCL ≥ 1.1 Vs
VTO ≥ 1.1 Vs
VCL ≥ 1.2 Vs
Climb gradient Gear up:
500 fpm @SL (AEO)
100 fpm @ SL (OEI)
Gear up:
300 fpm @SL (AEO)
Gear up:
3% @ VCL (OEI)
Gear down:
1/2% @ VTO
Field-length definition Takeoff distance over 50-ft obstacle Takeoff distance over 50-ft obstacle 115% of takeoff distance with AEO over 35-ft obstacle or balanced field length (see discussion in table C-4)
Rolling coef. μ = 0.025 not specified not specified
Vs: stall speed
VTO: takeoff velocity
VCL: climb velocity
AEO: all engines operating
OEI: one engine inoperative
From Nicolai and Carichner,[4] p. 257; see also Raymer, App. F., p. 804.

Table C-3: Takeoff requirements

Following engine failure, at decision speed V1 (1.1Vstall) either:

  1. Continue the takeoff (including obstacle clearance), or
  2. Stop.

If V  > V1, takeoff

If V  < V1, stop

  • V1 chosen such that distance for both is equal
  • Details require precise takeoff speed definitions (see Sean Lynn’s report, “Aircraft Takeoff Analysis in the Preliminary Design Phase,” on our website or the FARs)
  • Assume a smooth, hard, dry runway

Table C-4: Balanced field length (takeoff) (called critical field length for military aircraft)

Table C-5 defines the second segment climb and the associated one-engine inoperative (OEI) requirement, which applies to climbs from 35 feet to 400 feet above ground level for engine failure at V2, the airspeed at the 35-feet height point, with flaps in the takeoff position and landing gear retracted. Note that V2 > 1.2 Vs in takeoff configuration or V2 > 1.1 Vmc where Vmc represents the minimum control speed in the engine-out condition.

# of engines Climb gradient (CGR)
4 3%
3 2.7%
2 2.4%

Table C-5: Second segment climb requirement

Table C-6 defines the requirements for landing, which are similar to the takeoff requirements. Table C-7 defines the requirements for a missed approach. Table C-8 defines typical reserve fuel requirements used in design. Note that the ATA standards are actually more rigorous than the FARs. Table C-9 provides a brief summary of the stability and control issues. In certifying an airplane, the stability and control requirements and handling quality requirements are extremely rigorous and are becoming more so with every accident that occurs on existing airplanes.

Item MIL-C5011A (Military) FAR Part 23 (Civil) FAR Part 25 (Commercial)
Velocity VApp > 1.2 VS
VTD > 1.1 VS
VApp > 1.3 VS
VTD > 1.15 VS
VApp > 1.3 VS
VTD > 1.15 VS
Field-length definition Landing distance over 50-ft obstacle Landing distance
over 50-ft obstacle
Landing distance
over 50-ft obstacle divided by 0.6
Braking coefficient μ = 0.30 not specified not specified
Also note that the max stall speed for a Part 23 airplane is 61 kts.
From Nicolai and Carichner[5]; see also Raymer, App. F., p. 804.

Table C-6: CTOL landing requirements

# of engines Climb gradient (CGR)
4 2.7%
3 2.4%
2 2.1%

Table C-7: Missed approach requirement

FAR part 121 and ATA standards (more stringent than part 121)

  • Domestic operations
    • Fly one hour at end of cruise fuel flow for 99% max range.
    • Execute missed approach, climb out, and fly to alternate airport 200 NM away.
  • International operations
    • Fly 10% of trip time at normal cruise altitude at fuel flow for 99% max range.
    • Execute a missed approach, climb out, and fly to alternate airport 200 NM away.
  • Flight to alternate airport
    • Cruise thrust for 99% max range, then hold at greater of max. endurance or min. speed for comfortable handling.
    • Cruise at BCA unless greater than climb/descent distance.
  • Approximation often used in very early stages of design studies:
    • Add 400 to 600 NM to design range.

Table C-8: Reserve fuel requirements

FAR requirements are qualitative only.

MIL-STD-1797A (was MIL-SPEC-8785) is used to establish quantitative guidelines for control power requirements and handling qualities.

Good flying qualities depend on good nonlinear aerodynamics (stall characteristics):

  • In early design, before wind tunnel and flight test, draw on lessons from the past (Stinton’s Flying Qualities book is a good place to start).
  • Expect a lot of effort to go into getting this right.

Table C-9: Stability and control

You must carefully examine FAR Part 25 (https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-25) for more complete requirements.

C.1 Light Sport Aircraft (LSA)

Another category of aircraft are now governed by the FAA. Light sport aircraft are intended to make it easier for people to fly airplanes for fun. These aircraft have much simpler, but restrictive, certification requirements. In particular, the max stall speed is 45 kts (52 mph). The maximum weight is 1,320 pounds for land-based airplanes and 1,430 pounds for seaplanes (although several companies seem to have gotten waivers to allow for slightly higher weights). See https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-23 for more details.


  1. Raymer, D. P., Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, 4th ed., AIAA, Reston, 2006.
  2. Torenbeek, E., Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1982.
  3. Roskam, J., Airplane Design: Part VII. Determination of Stability, Control, and Performance Characteristics: FAR and Military Requirements, DARCorp, Lawrence, KS, 1988.
  4. Nicolai, L. M., and Carichner, G. E., Fundamentals of Aircraft Design, AIAA, Reston, 2010.
  5. Nicolai, L. M., and Carichner, G. E., Fundamentals of Aircraft Design, AIAA, Reston, 2010.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Lecture Notes on Configuration Aerodynamics Copyright © 2026 by (c) Estate of William H. Mason and Pradeep Raj is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book